Many of us might wonder why challenging an intervention order isn’t resolved in one swift hearing with the magistrate. It seems like multiple hearings could be time-consuming and inefficient.
While that might seem practical in terms of time, legally, there are steps that must be taken before the matter can proceed to a contested hearing.
Firstly, at the first mention date, the Court will ask what your position is in relation to the Intervention Order.
The Court will adjourn the matter to a directions hearing. This is another procedural hearing, and the magistrate will not be able to hear any evidence on that day. At this hearing, the Court may set dates for the Applicant to file of a further and better particular. This is a document that gives details of the incidents described in an application for an intervention order. Additionally, it allows the Respondent to obtain any necessary evidence from the other party.
Following this, you’ll have the chance to respond to and challenge the details provided by the Applicant, known as a “Response to Further and Better Particulars”.
where the Court may address various matters, such as the need for interpreters at the final hearing, whether witnesses will be called, the required duration for the hearing, your legal representation status, compliance of previous orders and readiness for a final contested hearing.
If the matter is deemed ready for the final hearing, the Court will schedule a date for it. During this hearing, the magistrate will consider all evidence presented by both sides, potentially including witness testimony. If you’re representing yourself, you may not have the opportunity to cross-examine the other party or their witnesses.
This procedural process ensures that all aspects of the case are thoroughly examined and allows for a fair and comprehensive determination by the Court. If you’re navigating an intervention order matter, don’t hesitate to reach out to us for assistance and guidance.
